W zależności od ilości danych do przetworzenia generowanie pliku może się wydłużyć.

Jeśli generowanie trwa zbyt długo można ograniczyć dane np. zmniejszając zakres lat.

Artykuł

Pobierz BibTeX

Tytuł

Chenopodium Seeds in Open-Air Archaeological Sites – How to Not Throw the Baby Out with the Bathwater

Autorzy

[ 1 ] Grupa IV Paleobotaniki i Paleośrodowiska, Instytut Botaniki im. W. Szafera Polskiej Akademii Nauk | [ P ] pracownik

Dyscyplina naukowa (Ustawa 2.0)

[7.5] Nauki biologiczne

Rok publikacji

2020

Opublikowano w

Environmental Archaeology

Rocznik: 2020 | Tom: 25

Typ artykułu

artykuł naukowy

Język publikacji

angielski

Słowa kluczowe
EN
Streszczenie

EN Differentiating between charred and uncharred plant remains may appear straightforward but for some taxa (here fat-hen, Chenopodium album type) can be very problematic. Recognition of the preservation state is obviously crucial for archaeobotanical data derived from dry, open-air sites. Fat-hen as a common weed, is also one of the most important components of a persistent soil seed bank. It is also a well-known food plant, gathered or cultivated. Numerous findings of fat-hen seeds in unclear states of preservation were noted in the Early Neolithic sites of the Linear Pottery culture in Kuyavia (N Europe). In previous studies such specimens were omitted as probably uncharred. Re-examination of Neolithic finds of fat-hen from that region showed the link of their abundancy with the earliest phases of the Neolithic occupation. The plant probably played an important role in the diet of the early Neolithic settlers there. It may indicate intensive use of local, open, fertile, probably alluvial areas. Distinguishing between ancient and modern specimens of that common weedy plant, producing large amounts of small, black, resistant seeds is thus very important, holding a great potential to shed new light on the origins of agricultural societies in this part of northern Europe.

Strony (od-do)

69 - 81

DOI

10.1080/14614103.2018.1536500

URL

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14614103.2018.1536500

Punktacja Ministerstwa / czasopismo

140

Punktacja Ministerstwa / czasopismo w ewaluacji 2017-2021

140